Jump to content

Photo

BF3 vs MW3

* * * * *

  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#16
Dy3nasty666

Dy3nasty666

  • Member
  • 517 Posts
Okay kids here's whatcha do. Go on xbox, add L3gacy96, game with me, watch me solo tank and clutch the game and win it for my team :D

Advertisement

The discussion continues after this sponsored message. Tired of seeing advertisements? Create an account to remove them.


#17
Anarchy

Anarchy

  • Member
  • 1,273 Posts

Okay kids here's whatcha do. Go on xbox, add L3gacy96, game with me, watch me solo tank and clutch the game and win it for my team :D

lmfao xD I might when i get the chance

#18
Dy3nasty666

Dy3nasty666

  • Member
  • 517 Posts
lol just went 39-2 and my team still lost 75-43 D: you know your teams shit when....

#19
Gavin

Gavin

  • Member
  • 8 Posts
i only have mw3.

#20
Anarchy

Anarchy

  • Member
  • 1,273 Posts

i only have mw3.

you should consider getting BF3, I'd say it's way better but then again it depends if you like solo shooting/rambo style or team based...

#21
Brad

Brad

  • Member
  • 1,455 Posts
Im a die hard cod fan :DBUT i bought BF3 a week ago and I am enjoying it :)It's more squad orientated but that can be a bad thing if your working with randomsBf3 you can chill on and just fly a jet around for a bitMw3 you can't chill but you can rage lolOne game makes me mad the other makes me chilled

#22
Anarchy

Anarchy

  • Member
  • 1,273 Posts

Bf3 you can chill on and just fly a jet around for a bit

that's right only for a bit...cause the minute you take off someone always shoots the shit out of you -.-

#23
Unknown ProbLem

Unknown ProbLem

  • Member
  • 364 Posts
Personally after playing both, I prefer Battlefield 3. I've played Bad Co. 2 and Modern Warfare 2 and between those two, i did prefer BC2 but only because of the teamwork, and lack of "effective" camping.As for this time around, I'd say Battlefield 3 all the way. Modern Warfare 3, to me, is absolutely painful to sit and play (even when I do good). I've always liked the team/tactical orientation of the Battlefield franchise, so one more to Battlefield. There is much more variety in Battlefield 3 over MW3 and the goals and medals don't make leveling an absolute hassle higher up (Colonel 35 :D) whereas by about 40 in Bad Co. 2 you had almost every insignia and you still needed about a BF3 Colonel's xp amount to level.Battlefield 3 has Dedicated Servers. hands down better. They are effectively less laggy (although it can be sometimes, but on average). I think that triumphs over Modern Warfare 3 because they are still ran by the "host" or lag magnet -.-.. the average quality of a match between them is very black and white and with Battlefield's new Rent-A-Server, you can actually play private matches again with your friends and fly the jet around all you want etc., whatever you desire.It all boils down to what you like more. The arcade style 1v1's in MW3 (even though half a team normally camps -.-) or the team tactical and squad of Battlefield 3 (although as mentioned earlier, being stuck with randoms [especially "noobs"] can be frustrating) Also, do you like vehicles or no?PS: in response to Anarchy, the jet flying at this point is too competitive, and i agree that there is nothing more annoying than that. (1000+ Jet kills here) There is really only two ways to get/be good at this point in a Jet, #1 Played it on launch day, or #2 play in a friend's private rent-a-server (unless you find a "no killing chill server")This has been a longish response to why i think Battlefield is better.-Unknown :D




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Not a member? Sign up!

Create Account
Already have an account? Sign in!
Logo

A place for Elder Scrolls fans.

4,741 Members 5,241 Discussions 35,397 Replies
This site is not affiliated with ZeniMax Media Inc. or any of its subsidiaries.
© 2018 ElderSouls.com