Jump to content

Photo

Differences Between MW3 and MW2?

* * * * * MW3 vs MW2

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1
David

David

  • Admin
  • 4,461 Posts
Maybe those of you who own the game can fill me in, because watching my friends play it looks nearly the same. Is it a better game?

Advertisement

The discussion continues after this sponsored message. Tired of seeing advertisements? Create an account to remove them.


#2
FunnyPirate

FunnyPirate

  • Member
  • 535 Posts
idk but I like more the maps of MW3 and the differences between the 3 types of killstreaks you can chose in-game: support, specialist or attacker or watever is a big difference.

#3
Fergal

Fergal

  • Member
  • 1,500 Posts
Not much, the kill-streak options are a big enough difference though, but it's pretty much the same. That's why I decided to get Black Ops again instead of MW3 for Christmas, since I already have MW2 anyway.Don't own MW3 of course, but I have played it a few times; and even Brad has said MW2 is probably better, and the maps suck apparently.

#4
Huygens

Huygens

  • Member
  • 1,271 Posts
What FunnyPirate said :o, MW2 was decent, BO was bad, MW3 is decent + some :)

#5
Fergal

Fergal

  • Member
  • 1,500 Posts
I don't understand why everyone hates Black Ops. The campaign if amazing, zombies is fun if you're bored and the multiplayer owns imo. I know a lot of people don't like the multiplayer I guess, but it's my favourite out of the whole lot! xDThe only thing I could think of is the quickscoping is harder... :o

#6
Mageman

Mageman

  • Member
  • 582 Posts
Like everyone is saying, it is in fact a lot like mw2. But some of the most notable PC differences are almost 0 hackers, they have dedicated servers for mods and less glitches. I also enjoy the maps more and most of the guns, although some need to be nerfed.

#7
FunnyPirate

FunnyPirate

  • Member
  • 535 Posts
I don't hate black ops I actualy like his campain, it's one of the best in all 8 cod games... Multiplayer is a bit bad and a thing that is realy bad in MW3 + in Bo is the multiplayer Respawns they are pretty bad, i've seen various videos with commenatries in youtube were people rewspawn 5 times in a row in the same place and they always get killed by the same guy w8ting there. Pretty bad point there!But cmparing MW2 and MW3 for me is that I actualy like more the types of 3 killstreaks and I don't like most maps in MW2 so I go for MW3.Also in a few weeks like 6 or 7 in 1 and half months I will buy the xbox with MW3 and it's actualy great because the xbox layout will be with MW3 signatures and colors, same for commands, it's realy cool. xD

#8
Brad

Brad

  • Member
  • 1,455 Posts
mainly the sweaty kids... =.= you can play MW3 for 10mins and your eyes will be stinging play MW2 for 2 hours and your chilled as.that and MW3 maps are full of clutter so rushers get it easayyyy

#9
FunnyPirate

FunnyPirate

  • Member
  • 535 Posts
no no, guys MW2 isn't that good as MW3, at least in my opinion.

#10
Dy3nasty666

Dy3nasty666

  • Member
  • 517 Posts
Idk. Mw3 has better killstreaks and the whole killstreak setup however both games are both not very good. Mw2 has better maps in my opinion. But then again Blops is and always will be better than them both.

#11
Huygens

Huygens

  • Member
  • 1,271 Posts
^Disagreed,black ops has TERRIBLE maps and a TERRIBLE spawn system! I fucking hate getting ass raped in my own base.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

This site is not affiliated with ZeniMax Media Inc. or any of its subsidiaries.