

Citadel Cap
Started by rebelmal, Aug 23 2011 02:14 PM
39 replies to this topic
#1
Posted August 23, 2011 - 02:14 PM

Don't know if it's been posted elsewhere but, how many members do the weekly cap? Should we create a thread or something that lets us check in that we have capped? I know I have only been a member just under two weeks but, I think it's needs everyone to do it. I do mine without fail as it helps the clan, just my opinion.EDIT: poor spelling

Advertisement
The discussion continues after this sponsored message. Tired of seeing advertisements? Create an account to remove them.
#2
Posted August 23, 2011 - 06:41 PM

I strongly agree. Everyone should post a picture of their cap for the citadel this week on this Topic will post my picture soon.
#3
Posted August 24, 2011 - 05:03 AM

#4
Posted August 24, 2011 - 07:08 AM

Ugh, I haven't been able to get on RS to harvest the roots. I should be able to this week, though.
#5
Posted August 24, 2011 - 10:25 AM

Yeah we really need to work on the citadel. We are close to degrading to tier one again :/
#6
Posted August 24, 2011 - 12:23 PM

#7
Posted August 24, 2011 - 02:36 PM

Ima get P2P tomorrow or in a few days...I've like 70% of chance of getting it before monday so I can do the resource cap before thursday the update...
#8
Posted August 24, 2011 - 08:07 PM

#9
Posted August 24, 2011 - 08:08 PM

#10
Posted August 24, 2011 - 08:24 PM

#11
Posted August 24, 2011 - 08:57 PM

Sweet, I'll chop like 600 logs and 400 ores or something like that.We do, but we need 5k timber for the Upkeep.
#12
Posted August 24, 2011 - 10:48 PM

Thank you Mono, also i like the "Ad" that asks if you've done your Citadel contribution yet. Should help, hopefully.
#13
Posted August 25, 2011 - 12:10 AM

Don't thank me; that idea was all David.Thank you Mono, also i like the "Ad" that asks if you've done your Citadel contribution yet. Should help, hopefully.
#14
Posted August 25, 2011 - 12:56 AM

#15
Posted August 25, 2011 - 11:04 PM

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users