#1
Posted August 23, 2012 - 10:23 AM

Advertisement
#2
Posted August 23, 2012 - 10:41 AM

#3
Posted August 23, 2012 - 11:28 AM

I don't get where this meme of "gameplay OR graphics" comes from. There's no reason you can't have both, and there's no reason people shouldn't want both. No one has much fun playing Snake on the Atari for several hours straight, because no one wants to play 16 pixel games when there's modern stuff out there. Graphics greatly add to the experience; just try playing Oblivion or Morrowind after an hour of Skyrim.I dont get why people want good graphics and resolutions so badly, it's about the gameplay right?
#4
Posted August 23, 2012 - 01:52 PM

Snake is lacking in both departments though. :PGraphics have never been a huge deal for me; as long as they are somewhat along the lines of what's common, then I can manage. But 4000 pixels is ridiculous, in the good way of course.Also, the PS4 in the picture looks like a grill.No one has much fun playing Snake on the Atari for several hours straight, because no one wants to play 16 pixel games when there's modern stuff out there. Graphics greatly add to the experience
- Huygens likes this
#5
Posted August 23, 2012 - 03:29 PM

#6
Posted August 23, 2012 - 03:45 PM

To be fair, 1080i and 1080p are exactly the same resolution, the only difference is how the content is scanned. "p" stands for progressive and "i" stands for interlaced; the only time you might/should notice a difference are in very fast scenes were there could be bluring.A better comparison is turning your monitor to 1024x768 and then trying 1920x1080 right after. You could also think of it like this: current 1080p resolutions contain 2,073,600 pixels. The 4k resolution in this article will probably be 4096x2304 (2304p), which would mean 9,437,184 pixels.The brain can hardly detect the difference between 1080i and 1080p. I don't see how 4000 pixels would benefit me at all.
#7
Posted August 23, 2012 - 03:49 PM


#9
Posted August 23, 2012 - 06:02 PM

The fan was outraged.* But in all seriousness which Megaman? Bad graphics rarely add charm ever imo, although some "vintage" games lose their feel with updates, and the only people that play them do so out of nostalgia. Graphical updates would obviously ruin that.Yes, but sometimes bad graphics add charm. I mean, look at Megaman. The fans were outraged when they tried to update their graphics.
#10
Posted August 23, 2012 - 09:08 PM

I believe it was the 3D Megaman games on the Ps2. Some people say it was underrated, but for the most part, I hear it getting a lot of hate for straying away from its roots. I don't have an opinion, since I never played them.Also, 3D Dot Game Heroes's charm came from its retro graphics. Remove that, and you have a pretty cut and dry adventure. The gameplay was still moderately fun, but I'm glad I found it cheap on Ebay, because that game is NOT worth $40, IMO.But in all seriousness which Megaman?
#11
Posted August 24, 2012 - 10:36 AM

Counterstrike? the graphics suck but it makes the game even on the new CS:GOthats just CS, sweet and simpleThe fan was outraged.*But in all seriousness which Megaman? Bad graphics rarely add charm ever imo, although some "vintage" games lose their feel with updates, and the only people that play them do so out of nostalgia. Graphical updates would obviously ruin that.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: PlayStation 4
![]() |
Discussion →
General Gaming →
Video Game Deals →
PlayStation 4 500GB Pre-Order Amazon Free ShippingStarted by David, 16 Jun 2013 ![]() |
|
![]() |
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users